Editorial Policy

How an article gets made

1. Research. Keyword and search-intent research uses DataForSEO data; every factual claim in a published article must trace to a cited, retrievable source.
2. Drafting. A writer model produces a draft strictly from the assembled evidence bundle — it may not invent testing, users, quotes, prices, or statistics.
3. Deterministic checks. Automated checks run first: schema validity, duplicate/similarity checks, broken links, disclosure presence, and a scan for secrets, PII, or disallowed topics.
4. Three independent reviews. An adversarial fact/freshness reviewer, a search-intent and commercial-integrity reviewer, and an editorial/citation/policy reviewer each evaluate the draft independently, without seeing each other's verdicts.
5. Final decision. A CEO-level model decision — publish, revise, reject, or hold — considers the draft, the evidence, and all three reviews together. A critical issue cannot be waived; it requires a new revision and a full new review round.

What we do not claim

We do not claim a human editor reviewed every article line by line — the review layer is AI-assisted and multi-model, not a newsroom human edit. We do not invent product testing, user interviews, or expert author identities. We do not publish unsupported market-share, user-count, revenue, or conversion claims.

Financial content policy

This content is educational information only — not financial, investment, or trading advice, and not individualised for your circumstances. Trading involves substantial risk of loss. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any instrument.

Corrections

If you find an factual error, contact us and we will verify it against current sources and update the article, noting the new "last verified" date.